---
format: "aidr-story-markdown/v1"
id: "f846b630bec3a503daeb64c5b1817c8fd661bce7bd315e3ac7260d7a3cf297a4"
canonical_url: "https://aidr.today/f846b630?lang=en"
title: "Who May Overrule the Agent? Evidence-Gated Authority in LLM Review Institutions"
lang: "en"
requested_lang: "en"
available_langs: ["en","vi"]
translation_fallback: null
fallback_fields: []
published_at: "2026-11-05T05:00:00.000Z"
category: "Research"
topics: ["agent"]
source_urls: ["https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05390"]
summary: "A study compares broad override authority with an evidence gate that permits replacement only after a reviewer produces a mechanically valid record of a binding-constraint violation and a compliant repair, finding that the gate sharply reduces corruption of correct proposals while retaining most repairs of violations."
---

# Who May Overrule the Agent? Evidence\-Gated Authority in LLM Review Institutions

> [Open the canonical story](<https://aidr.today/f846b630?lang=en>)

**Published:** 2026-11-05T05:00:00.000Z
**Category:** Research
**Topics:** agent

## Summary

A study compares broad override authority with an evidence gate that permits replacement only after a reviewer produces a mechanically valid record of a binding\-constraint violation and a compliant repair, finding that the gate sharply reduces corruption of correct proposals while retaining most repairs of violations\.

## Sources

- [Story source](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05390>)