---
format: "aidr-story-markdown/v1"
id: "4151f9a5ea5e46024aac76eca5f09bce8c6addf2b6392bad53af3b66e2461b18"
canonical_url: "https://aidr.today/4151f9a5?lang=en"
title: "Ray-Ban Meta Audio glasses review: no camera is a bonus for some, good audio quality, and Meta AI works well, but lingering privacy concerns and fairly pricey (Samantha Kelly/Bloomberg)"
lang: "en"
requested_lang: "en"
available_langs: ["en","vi"]
translation_fallback: null
fallback_fields: []
published_at: "2026-10-26T11:10:16.000Z"
category: "Products"
topics: ["meta"]
source_urls: ["https://www.techmeme.com/261026/p13"]
summary: "Samantha Kelly reviews the $349-and-up Ray-Ban Meta Audio glasses, noting good audio quality and effective Meta AI performance, but citing lingering privacy concerns and a high price point."
---

# Ray\-Ban Meta Audio glasses review: no camera is a bonus for some, good audio quality, and Meta AI works well, but lingering privacy concerns and fairly pricey \(Samantha Kelly/Bloomberg\)

> [Open the canonical story](<https://aidr.today/4151f9a5?lang=en>)

**Published:** 2026-10-26T11:10:16.000Z
**Category:** Products
**Topics:** meta

## Summary

Samantha Kelly reviews the $349\-and\-up Ray\-Ban Meta Audio glasses, noting good audio quality and effective Meta AI performance, but citing lingering privacy concerns and a high price point\.

## Sources

- [Story source](<https://www.techmeme.com/261026/p13>)